Model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemini 1.0 Pro in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.6 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for Claude Fable 5.1 and 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 69.0 | 27.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2023-12-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1528 | 1108 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1744 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| GSO | 88.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 55.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1109 |
| DTBench | 97.6% | 45.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 164.7 | 117.04 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
Math Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 1.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1525 | 1132 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 11.2% |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1535 | 1059 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 34% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
| MMLU | — | 70% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4), Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1318 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1138 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1586 | 1124 |
| LMArena French | 1525 | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1500 | 1125 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1543 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1521 | 1186 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1516 | 1119 |
| LMArena Korean | 1534 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1114 |
Long Context Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1522 | 1132 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2), Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Gemini 1.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1510 | 1149 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1131 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 1139 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Gemini 1.0 Pro?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Gemini 1.0 Pro better for coding?
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24.