Model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 89.6 to 35.5.
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 69.0 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1528 | 1308 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1744 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| GSO | 88.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 164.7 | — |
Math Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1525 | 1268 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1535 | 1252 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
Multimodal Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1318 | 1180 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1586 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1521 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1525 | — |
| LMArena German | 1500 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1543 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1534 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1516 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1251 |
Long Context Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1522 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1510 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 1254 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.