Model comparison
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Longcat Flash Chat
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Fable 5.1 leads 76.7 to 19.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 90% for Claude Fable 5.1 and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 69.0 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $50 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 74.7 (#1), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1528 | 1471 |
| FrontierCode | 50.9% | — |
| CursorBench | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1744 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 56.3% | — |
| SciCode | 63.1% | — |
| GSO | 88.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 92.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | 73.3% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 2,143 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 50.7 (#5), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 68.6% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | 17.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 29.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,422 | — |
Reasoning Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#7), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1526 | 1440 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | — |
| CritPt | 31.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 47% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 57.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 58% | — |
| DTBench | 97.6% | — |
| LMCA | 65.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 164.7 | — |
Math Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 89.6 (#4), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1525 | 1442 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 90.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 87.8% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | 0% | — |
Knowledge Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 69.6 (#6), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1535 | 1454 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 70.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Fable 5.1: 53.9 (#4), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1318 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 41.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 70% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1513 | — |
Multilingual Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 59.1 (#3), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1507 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1586 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1525 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1500 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1543 | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | 1534 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1521 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1516 | 1445 |
Instruction Following Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#6), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1517 | 1411 |
Long Context Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 46.7 (#20), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1522 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5.1 leads
Claude Fable 5.1: 79.2 (#2), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1510 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1507 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1492 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2162 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Claude Fable 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 69.0 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Fable 5.1 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Claude Fable 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 74.7 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5.1 and Longcat Flash Chat share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5.1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.