Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Yi-34B

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

66.3

Rank #5 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.4

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Fable 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5 leads 88.4 to 19.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 85.9% for Claude Fable 5 and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Fable 5Yi-34B
ProviderAnthropic01.AI
Noometry Index66.327.4
Released2026-06-072023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$50—
Results tracked6123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 67.0 (#4), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Coding15191112
DeepSWE69.9%—
FrontierCode53.5%—
LMArena WebDev1626—
FrontierSWE47%—
SciCode61%—
WeirdML91.9%—
MirrorCode63.9%—
ALE-Bench2,041—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 54.1 (#2), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
APEX-Agents63.6%—
Remote Labor Index16.1%—
τ²-bench Banking39.7%—
PostTrainBench41.8%—
GBAEval74.5%—
GDP.pdf30%—
LMArena Search1230—
Vending-Bench 25,680—

Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#4), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts15081104
Epoch Capabilities Index163.6117.28
ARC-AGI-289.2%—
SimpleBench81.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark91.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)92.7%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt28.6%—
Chess Puzzles41%—
EnigmaEval39.3%—
EBR-Bench39.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles52%—
DTBench98.4%—
LMCA61.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Bench to the Future 30.13—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 88.4 (#5), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Math15191114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87%—
FrontierMath Tier 490.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench95%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
FrontierMath Erdős0%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 62.3 (#22), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond85.9%14.7%
LMArena Expert15341061
SimpleQA Verified70.7%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Fable 5: 45.6 (#14), Yi-34B: —

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1326—
Blueprint-Bench 238.6%—
Furniture Assembly35.8%—
LMArena Document1496—

Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 57.6 (#8), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14831079
LMArena Chinese15461175
LMArena French15091080
LMArena German14861042
LMArena Japanese1507993
LMArena Korean1493959
LMArena Russian15071050
LMArena Spanish15031070

Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 78.8 (#7), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following15031091

Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#22), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query15101094

Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads

Claude Fable 5: 76.1 (#5), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)

BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Yi-34B
LMArena Text14911129
LMArena Creative Writing14941108
LMArena Multi-Turn15051113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1943—
EQ-Bench 41340—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Fable 5 better than Yi-34B?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Fable 5 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.0 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Fable 5 and Yi-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Fable 5 has 61 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper