Model comparison

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Grok 3

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic

49.5

Rank #52 Confirmed

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher in 4 categories and Grok 3 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Haiku 5.5 leads 73.6 to 38.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 98.9% for Claude Haiku 5.5 and 55.6% for Grok 3.

Side by side

Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 3 specifications
Claude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index49.539.9
Released2026-10-072025-04-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked940

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 49.2 (#50), Grok 3: 41.9 (#115)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
Aider Polyglot—53.3%
LMArena WebDev1587—
WeirdML—37.2%
LMArena Coding—1432

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Grok 3: 30.5 (#76)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
BALROG—29.5%

Reasoning Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 35.2 (#69), Grok 3: 13.7 (#333)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
ARC-AGI-2—0%
SimpleBench—36.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
NYT Connections (extended)65.7%—
ARC-AGI-1—5.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1434
Mystery Game Puzzles30%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.33

Math Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 73.6 (#18), Grok 3: 38.0 (#145)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%55.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)75.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
Omni-MATH—46.4%
LMArena Math—1391
MATH Level 5—88.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—3.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Claude Haiku 5.5 leads

Claude Haiku 5.5: 50.8 (#70), Grok 3: 46.2 (#82)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
GPQA Diamond89.6%75.8%
SimpleQA Verified23.8%—
MMLU-Pro—78.8%
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.8%
GPQA (HELM)—65%
LMArena Expert—1421

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: 43.7 (#21), Grok 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
Furniture Assembly47.5%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Grok 3: 52.3 (#87)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
LMArena Non-English—1410
LMArena Chinese—1448
LMArena French—1460
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1387
LMArena Korean—1373
LMArena Russian—1416
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Grok 3: 75.0 (#73)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
IFEval—88.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1409

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Grok 3: 38.7 (#192)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
Fiction.LiveBench—58.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1439

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Haiku 5.5: —, Grok 3: 55.8 (#141)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3
LMArena Text—1426
LMArena Creative Writing—1414
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.4%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1186
WildBench—84.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Grok 3?

Claude Haiku 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 or Grok 3 better for coding?

Claude Haiku 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Haiku 5.5 and Grok 3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper