Model comparison

Claude Instant vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Instant Anthropic

29.5

Unranked Sparse

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Instant scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.8% for Claude Instant and 96% for Grok 4.7.

Side by side

Claude Instant and Grok 4.7 specifications
Claude InstantGrok 4.7
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index29.553.1
Released2023-08-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
FrontierCode—47.6%
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%
LMArena Coding—1427
HumanEval+50.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Claude Instant: 19.6, Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
DTBench45.8%96%
Epoch Capabilities Index120.28153.53
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1413
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
LMCA—49.4%

Math Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.1%
ProofBench—34%
LMArena Math—1407
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—56%
LMArena Expert—1422
ARC (AI2) Challenge86.3%—
MMLU73.4%—
TriviaQA78.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English—1389
LMArena Chinese—1455
LMArena French—1455
LMArena Russian—1397
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query—1413

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Instant: —, Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude InstantGrok 4.7
LMArena Text—1399
LMArena Creative Writing—1391
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
LMArena Multi-Turn—1393

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Instant better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); Claude Instant does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Instant and Grok 4.7 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Instant has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper