Model comparison

Claude Mythos Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#31); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Mythos Preview Anthropic

41.2

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek V4 Pro DeepSeek

54.3

Rank #31 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude Mythos Preview leads 41.4 to 32.8.
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Mythos Preview and DeepSeek V4 Pro specifications
Claude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
ProviderAnthropicDeepSeek
Noometry Index41.254.3
Released2026-04-072026-04-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1.98
Results tracked248

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 52.4 (#34)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
SWE-bench Verified—77.6%
FrontierCode—28.6%
LMArena WebDev—1582
SciCode—51%
WeirdML—66.2%
LMArena Coding—1470
ALE-Bench—1,403

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Mythos Preview leads

Claude Mythos Preview: 41.4, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 32.8 (#58)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
APEX-Agents—47.3%
ExploitBench73.8%—
METR Time Horizons85.2%—
Vending-Bench 2—3,285

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 56.5 (#24)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
ARC-AGI-2—61.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—53.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—91.3%
ARC-AGI-1—90.5%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—47%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1461
Mystery Game Puzzles—43%
DTBench—93.9%
LMCA—45.5%
Surface Evolver Bench—40%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.31
ForecastBench—56.1

Math Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 64.8 (#30)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—26.8%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—76.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.6%
ProofBench—50%
LMArena Math—1455

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 59.5 (#31)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
GPQA Diamond—91.7%
SimpleQA Verified—52.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—8.6%
LMArena Expert—1464

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 54.4 (#45)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Non-English—1439
LMArena Chinese—1486
LMArena French—1472
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1447
LMArena Russian—1453
LMArena Spanish—1458

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 76.1 (#47)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1448

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 45.0 (#51)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
CL-bench Life—13.5%
LMArena Longer Query—1458

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, DeepSeek V4 Pro: 65.5 (#46)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewDeepSeek V4 Pro
LMArena Text—1451
LMArena Creative Writing—1446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1553
EQ-Bench 4—1166
LMArena Multi-Turn—1467

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Mythos Preview better than DeepSeek V4 Pro?

DeepSeek V4 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#31); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Mythos Preview and DeepSeek V4 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Mythos Preview has 2 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4 Pro has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper