Model comparison

Claude Mythos Preview vs GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Mythos Preview Anthropic

41.2

Unranked Sparse

GPT-5.5 OpenAI

63.4

Rank #9 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Mythos Preview scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-5.5 leads 50.7 to 41.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ExploitBench: 73.8% for Claude Mythos Preview and 47.4% for GPT-5.5.

Side by side

Claude Mythos Preview and GPT-5.5 specifications
Claude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index41.263.4
Released2026-04-072026-04-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$5
Output $ / M tokens—$30
Results tracked271

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 58.2 (#17)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
SWE-bench Verified—80.6%
DeepSWE—67%
FrontierCode—43%
LMArena WebDev—1513
SciCode—56.1%
GSO—40.2%
WeirdML—84.9%
LMArena Coding—1494
MirrorCode—10%
ALE-Bench—1,943

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-5.5 leads

Claude Mythos Preview: 41.4, GPT-5.5: 50.7 (#6)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
ExploitBench73.8%47.4%
Terminal-Bench—84.7%
APEX-Agents—55.1%
OSWorld 2.0—13%
Remote Labor Index—6.3%
τ²-bench Banking—44.6%
DeepResearch Bench—54%
PostTrainBench—27.2%
GBAEval—53.2%
GDP.pdf—26%
LMArena Search—1242
METR Time Horizons85.2%—
Vending-Bench 2—7,524

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 72.8 (#11)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
ARC-AGI-2—85%
SimpleBench—69%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—88.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—96.2%
ARC-AGI-1—95%
CritPt—27.1%
Chess Puzzles—54%
EBR-Bench—34.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1489
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—54.3%
Surface Evolver Bench—88.1%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—159.1
ForecastBench—60.6

Math Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 81.7 (#11)

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 64.4 (#17)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—63%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
LMArena Expert—1508

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 46.9 (#12)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
LMArena Vision—1297
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.2%
Furniture Assembly—44.2%
LMArena Document—1486

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 56.4 (#20)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
LMArena Non-English—1467
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena French—1486
LMArena German—1480
LMArena Japanese—1498
LMArena Korean—1460
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1468

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 77.5 (#18)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 48.3 (#12)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
CL-bench Life—22.2%
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Mythos Preview: —, GPT-5.5: 72.7 (#13)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Mythos PreviewGPT-5.5
LMArena Text—1472
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1844
EQ-Bench 4—1315
LMArena Multi-Turn—1476

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Mythos Preview better than GPT-5.5?

GPT-5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#9); Claude Mythos Preview does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Mythos Preview and GPT-5.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Mythos Preview has 2 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 has 71.

Related comparisons

Go deeper