Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multimodal, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 35.7 to 26.8.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.0 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-08-05 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 32K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $75 | — |
| Results tracked | 48 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.4 (#73), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1479 | 1418 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1390 | — |
| WeirdML | 45.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 674.77 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.34 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 35.0 (#41), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 38% | — |
| GDPval | 43.6% | — |
| Cybench | 42% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 48.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1148 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.8% | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 32.2 (#76), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1416 |
| SimpleBench | 60% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 7.2% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 7.9% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 21% | — |
| DTBench | 80% | — |
| LMCA | 37.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.12 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 22.3 (#277), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 12.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 2.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1431 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 7.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Opus 4.1: 42.0 (#101), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.3% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 11.5% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | — |
Multimodal Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 26.8 (#119), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
| VPCT | 35% | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 52.0 (#95), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1405 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena French | 1431 | — |
| LMArena German | 1413 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1448 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 75.6 (#58), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1435 | 1397 |
Long Context Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 44.5 (#63), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.1 leads
Claude Opus 4.1: 62.4 (#74), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.1 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1412 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1422 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.1 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.4 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.1 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.1 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.