Model comparison
Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 56.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 3 categories and Gemini 4 Argon in 7 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 62.6 to 43.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 54% for Claude Opus 4.7 and 99% for Gemini 4 Argon.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 58.3 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-14 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | — |
| Results tracked | 66 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1558 | 1678 |
| SciCode | 54.5% | 61.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1518 | 1550 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 83.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 38.5% | — |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| GSO | 44.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 76.4% | — |
| MirrorCode | 31.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,323 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 49.2% | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,937 | 13,718 |
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 18.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 40.2% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 28.6% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.5% | — |
| GBAEval | 43.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 21% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1233 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1506 | 1548 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 75.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 80.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 39% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 93.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 30% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 72.8% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 19% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 28% | — |
| DTBench | 94.7% | — |
| LMCA | 52.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.25 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.3 | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 54% | 99% |
| LMArena Math | 1499 | 1536 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 70.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 31.7% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 73.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 43.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 22.9% | — |
Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1521 | 1553 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 36.2% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 51.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 12% | — |
Multimodal Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 24.5% | 54.4% |
| LMArena Vision | 1316 | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1495 | — |
Multilingual Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1480 | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1531 | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | 1494 | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1495 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1503 | — |
| LMArena German | 1495 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1472 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1464 | — |
Instruction Following Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1498 | 1538 |
Long Context Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1505 | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads
Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1490 | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1486 | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1505 | 1557 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1914 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1311 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 56.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 59.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Gemini 4 Argon share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.