Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Hy3

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic

58.3

Rank #19 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Hy3 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 4.7 leads 53.8 to 26.1.
  • Hy3 is cheaper at $0.0825 / $0.33 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • Claude Opus 4.7 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Opus 4.7Hy3
ProviderAnthropicTencent
Noometry Index58.344.2
Released2026-04-142026-07-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output128K128K
Input $ / M tokens$5$0.0825
Output $ / M tokens$25$0.33
Results tracked6619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 59.6 (#13), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena WebDev15581508
LMArena Coding15181464
SWE-bench Verified83.5%—
FrontierCode38.5%—
SciCode54.5%—
GSO44.1%—
WeirdML76.4%—
MirrorCode31.1%—
ALE-Bench1,323—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 47.9 (#10), Hy3: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
Terminal-Bench80.2%—
APEX-Agents49.2%—
OSWorld 2.018.2%—
τ²-bench Banking40.2%—
PostTrainBench28.6%—
ExploitBench26.5%—
GBAEval43.8%—
GDP.pdf21%—
LMArena Search1233—
Vending-Bench 210,937—

Reasoning Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 53.8 (#29), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
NYT Connections (extended)39%41.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts15061447
ARC-AGI-275.8%—
SimpleBench61.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark80.7%—
ARC-AGI-193.5%—
CritPt12%—
Chess Puzzles30%—
Thematic Generalization72.8%—
EBR-Bench19%—
Mystery Game Puzzles28%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA52.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.25—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 66.7 (#26), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Math14991475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)70.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions73.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench54%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)43.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)22.9%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 62.6 (#23), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Expert15211460
GPQA Diamond90.2%—
Humanity's Last Exam36.2%—
SimpleQA Verified51.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 4.7: 41.2 (#38), Hy3: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Vision1316—
Blueprint-Bench 224.5%—
Furniture Assembly33.3%—
LMArena Document1495—

Multilingual Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 57.3 (#10), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Non-English14801426
LMArena Chinese15311493
LMArena French15031461
LMArena German14951439
LMArena Japanese14721392
LMArena Korean14641395
LMArena Russian14941432
LMArena Spanish14951456

Instruction Following Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 78.4 (#10), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Instruction Following14981426

Long Context Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 46.2 (#25), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Longer Query15051442

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 4.7 leads

Claude Opus 4.7: 75.1 (#8), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Hy3
LMArena Text14901439
LMArena Creative Writing14861402
LMArena Multi-Turn15051436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1914—
EQ-Bench 41311—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.7 better than Hy3?

Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.3 to 44.2 on the Noometry Index. Hy3 costs 69× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Hy3?

Hy3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0825 per million input tokens and $0.33 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 4.7 lists at $5 and $25.

Is Claude Opus 4.7 or Hy3 better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 46.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Opus 4.7 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 4.7 and Hy3 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 4.7 has 66 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper