Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic

68.6

Rank #3 Confirmed

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Google

32.9

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Claude Opus 5.5 leads 57.8 to 26.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Blueprint-Bench 2: 51.2% for Claude Opus 5.5 and 0% for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index68.632.9
Released2026-09-222026-04-14
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$4—
Output $ / M tokens$20—
Results tracked441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 71.9 (#3), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
FrontierCode54.6%—
CursorBench57.8%—
LMArena WebDev1813—
FrontierSWE62.3%—
SciCode66.9%—
LMArena Coding1547—
MirrorCode77.4%—
ALE-Bench2,147—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 45.3 (#15), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
APEX-Agents73.5%—
GDP.pdf30.6%—
Vending-Bench 29,235—

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.2 (#3), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
ARC-AGI-293.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)88.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
EBR-Bench71.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1535—
Mystery Game Puzzles71%—
DTBench98.9%—
LMCA68.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index167.33—

Math Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 91.8 (#3), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)91.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 495%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math1506—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 66.4 (#10), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
GPQA Diamond90.6%—
SimpleQA Verified72.2%—
LMArena Expert1547—

Multimodal Claude Opus 5.5 leads

Claude Opus 5.5: 57.8 (#1), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: 26.8

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
Blueprint-Bench 251.2%0%
LMArena Vision1321—
Furniture Assembly83.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 59.1 (#2), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Non-English1507—
LMArena Chinese1588—
LMArena French1514—
LMArena Russian1520—
LMArena Spanish1507—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 80.0 (#3), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Instruction Following1537—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 47.1 (#19), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Longer Query1532—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Opus 5.5: 78.2 (#3), Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6
LMArena Text1515—
LMArena Creative Writing1533—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2050—
LMArena Multi-Turn1499—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5.5 better than Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6?

Claude Opus 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#3); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Opus 5.5 has 44 scored results on Noometry and Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper