Noometry

Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs ERNIE 5.0 0110

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.8

Rank #4 Confirmed

ERNIE 5.0 0110 Baidu

41.8

Rank #129 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 9 categories and ERNIE 5.0 0110 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Opus 5 leads 77.2 to 17.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 94.3% for Claude Opus 5 and 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
ProviderAnthropicBaidu
Noometry Index67.841.8
Released2026-07-24—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked5720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Coding15341455
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1691—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), ERNIE 5.0 0110: —

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%10.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts15261445
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
Thematic Generalization—41.7%
EBR-Bench45.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.78—

Math Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Math15311437
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Expert15571428
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—

Multimodal Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Vision13191249
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Non-English15011436
LMArena Chinese15741512
LMArena French15191467
LMArena German15241460
LMArena Japanese15161382
LMArena Korean15211406
LMArena Russian15071446
LMArena Spanish15191473

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Instruction Following15171413

Long Context Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Longer Query15151422

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)

BenchmarkClaude Opus 5ERNIE 5.0 0110
LMArena Text15071445
LMArena Creative Writing14911426
LMArena Multi-Turn14991434
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
EQ-Bench 41385—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than ERNIE 5.0 0110?

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5 or ERNIE 5.0 0110 better for coding?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 43.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and ERNIE 5.0 0110 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper