Model comparison
Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.7 to 59.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 43 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 43 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 9 categories and Gemini 3.7 Flash in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5 leads 86.1 to 69.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 99% for Claude Opus 5 and 58% for Gemini 3.7 Flash.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 5.
- Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 67.7 | 59.8 |
| Released | 2026-07-24 | 2026-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $5 | $0.75 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $25 | $3.75 |
| Results tracked | 57 | 44 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 67.0 (#5), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 55.7 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 73.6% | 65.5% |
| FrontierCode | 53.4% | 43.6% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1694 | 1593 |
| FrontierSWE | 52% | 20.3% |
| SciCode | 56.4% | 59.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1533 | 1499 |
| ALE-Bench | 2,165 | 904.3 |
| CursorBench | 46.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 91.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 55.5 (#1), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 42.2 (#18)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 65.8% | 67.8% |
| GDP.pdf | 24% | 23.8% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 31.4% | — |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | 48.7% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 35% | — |
| BALROG | 63.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 79.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 11,182 | — |
Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 77.1 (#3), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 70.1 (#12)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 90.4% | 84.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 94.3% | 94% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 97.5% | 95.5% |
| CritPt | 29.1% | 14.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 42% | 47% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1525 | 1497 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 59% | 37% |
| DTBench | 97.9% | 96.8% |
| LMCA | 64.5% | 50.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.67 | 157.72 |
| SimpleBench | 80.6% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 45.7% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | 0.12 | — |
Math Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 86.1 (#6), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.5 (#18)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 85.6% | 71.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 73.2% | 36.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.9% | 97.2% |
| ProofBench | 99% | 58% |
| LMArena Math | 1533 | 1511 |
Knowledge Gemini 3.7 Flash leads
Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#8), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 69.8 (#4)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | 94.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 59.9% | 69.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1558 | 1508 |
Multimodal Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 51.1 (#6), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 36.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1321 | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | 60.8% | 26.7% |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 30.4% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1516 | — |
Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#3), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 57.8 (#7)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1500 | 1485 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1575 | 1553 |
| LMArena French | 1522 | 1512 |
| LMArena German | 1522 | 1485 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1510 | 1506 |
| LMArena Korean | 1526 | 1486 |
| LMArena Russian | 1507 | 1519 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1519 | 1507 |
Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 79.3 (#5), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 78.0 (#12)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1516 | 1486 |
Long Context Too close to call
Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#20), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 45.8 (#28)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1516 | 1493 |
Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads
Claude Opus 5: 79.3 (#2), Gemini 3.7 Flash: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 5 | Gemini 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1506 | 1487 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1491 | 1490 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2133 | 1723 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1496 | 1495 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1385 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Opus 5 better than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.7 to 59.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Opus 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.75 per million input tokens and $3.75 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 5 lists at $5 and $25.
Is Claude Opus 5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.0 versus 55.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.7 Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash share?
43 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.7 Flash has 44.