Model comparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Mistral

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5 Anthropic

67.8

Rank #4 Confirmed

Mistral Mistral AI

29.9

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Opus 5 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Opus 5 leads 86.2 to 22.3.

Side by side

Claude Opus 5 and Mistral specifications
Claude Opus 5Mistral
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index67.829.9
Released2026-07-24—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$5—
Output $ / M tokens$25—
Results tracked5722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 67.5 (#5), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Coding15341162
DeepSWE73.6%—
FrontierCode53.4%—
CursorBench46.6%—
LMArena WebDev1691—
FrontierSWE52%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML91.8%—
ALE-Bench2,165—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 55.6 (#1), Mistral: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
APEX-Agents65.8%—
OSWorld 2.031.4%—
τ²-bench Banking48.7%—
PostTrainBench35%—
BALROG63.4%—
GBAEval79.6%—
GDP.pdf24%—
Vending-Bench 211,182—

Reasoning Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 77.2 (#4), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Hard Prompts15261149
ARC-AGI-290.4%—
SimpleBench80.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)94.3%—
ARC-AGI-197.5%—
CritPt29.1%—
Chess Puzzles42%—
EBR-Bench45.7%—
Mystery Game Puzzles59%—
DTBench97.9%—
LMCA64.5%—
Bench to the Future 30.12—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.78—

Math Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 86.2 (#8), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Math15311180
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)85.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 473.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench99%—
Omni-MATH—7.2%

Knowledge Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 66.8 (#9), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Expert15571125
GPQA Diamond93.9%—
SimpleQA Verified59.9%—
MMLU-Pro—27.7%
GPQA (HELM)—30.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Opus 5: 50.8 (#8), Mistral: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Vision1319—
Blueprint-Bench 230.4%—
Furniture Assembly60.8%—
LMArena Document1516—

Multilingual Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 58.8 (#4), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Non-English15011129
LMArena Chinese15741109
LMArena French15191180
LMArena German15241155
LMArena Japanese15161013
LMArena Korean15211032
LMArena Russian15071168
LMArena Spanish15191143

Instruction Following Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#7), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Instruction Following15171152
IFEval—56.8%

Long Context Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 46.5 (#21), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Longer Query15151153

Writing & Preference Claude Opus 5 leads

Claude Opus 5: 79.2 (#1), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5Mistral
LMArena Text15071165
LMArena Creative Writing14911158
LMArena Multi-Turn14991147
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2133—
WildBench—66%
EQ-Bench 41385—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 5 better than Mistral?

Claude Opus 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 67.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Opus 5 or Mistral better for coding?

Claude Opus 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Opus 5 and Mistral share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Opus 5 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper