Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Grok 4

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic

50.3

Rank #50 Confirmed

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 6 categories and Grok 4 in 4 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 45.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 60.4% for Claude Sonnet 4.6 and 16% for Grok 4.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4 specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index50.348.1
Released2026-02-172025-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5748

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.3 (#67), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
WeirdML66.1%45.7%
LMArena Coding15041408
SWE-bench Verified75.2%—
DeepSWE29.9%—
FrontierCode24.3%—
Aider Polyglot—79.6%
LMArena WebDev1522—
SciCode46.8%—
ALE-Bench1,327—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#28), Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
Terminal-Bench53.4%27.2%
DeepResearch Bench54.9%47.3%
LMArena Search12211142
APEX-Agents43%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
OSWorld 2.09.3%—
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
OSWorld72.1%—
BALROG—43.6%
ExploitBench23.6%—
GBAEval48.8%—
GDP.pdf18%—
METR Time Horizons—66.6%
Vending-Bench 27,204—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#45), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
ARC-AGI-260.4%16%
ARC-AGI-186.5%66.7%
Chess Puzzles13%28%
LMArena Hard Prompts14841409
Epoch Capabilities Index152.24146.44
ForecastBench6260.9
SimpleBench—60.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.6%
NYT Connections (extended)80.9%—
CritPt3.1%—
Thematic Generalization76.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles16%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA46.5%—

Math Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 52.9 (#49), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202585.8%84%
LMArena Math14621422
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)32.4%19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)8.3%2.1%
ProofBench45%—
Omni-MATH—60.3%

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.7 (#65), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
GPQA Diamond87.4%87%
LMArena Expert15001415
SimpleQA Verified35.5%—
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.6%—
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multimodal Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#68), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
LMArena Vision12831210
GeoBench—45%
Blueprint-Bench 26.7%—
LMArena Document1482—

Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.4 (#41), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
LMArena Non-English14401403
LMArena Chinese14911427
LMArena French14651418
LMArena German14281429
LMArena Japanese14201394
LMArena Korean14111377
LMArena Russian14401410
LMArena Spanish14641420

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.4 (#25), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
LMArena Instruction Following14751387
IFEval—94.9%

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#44), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
LMArena Longer Query14791409
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.2 (#22), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.6Grok 4
LMArena Text14581411
LMArena Creative Writing14351397
LMArena Multi-Turn14641416
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1810—
WildBench—79.7%
EQ-Bench 41207—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Grok 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 48.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 46.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Grok 4 share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper