Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Gemini 3 Flash Preview Google

52.3

Rank #33 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Gemini 3 Flash Preview in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 51.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 100% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 15% for Gemini 3 Flash Preview.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index60.552.3
Released2026-09-282025-12-17
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1.05M
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.50
Output $ / M tokens$10$3
Results tracked1659

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.5 (#35)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena WebDev16991439
ALE-Bench1,8191,367
SWE-bench Verified—75.4%
FrontierCode52.1%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
CursorBench55.5%—
SWE-bench Multilingual—72.7%
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
GSO—9.8%
WeirdML—61.6%
LMArena Coding—1460

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 38.6 (#27)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Terminal-Bench—64.3%
APEX-Agents75.5%—
τ²-bench Airline—82.5%
τ²-bench Banking—27.3%
τ²-bench Retail—76.8%
τ²-bench Telecom—91.2%
DeepResearch Bench—49.8%
BALROG—48.1%
GDP.pdf—10%
LMArena Search—1198
Vending-Bench 2—3,635

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 49.2 (#35)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Mystery Game Puzzles65%26%
ARC-AGI-2—33.6%
SimpleBench—61.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—83.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84.7%
CritPt31.4%—
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1465
DTBench—89.1%
LMCA—43.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.83
ForecastBench—58.5

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 51.4 (#42)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%51.2%
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%95.6%
ProofBench100%15%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—67.6%
LMArena Math—1472
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—35.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 58.8 (#30)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
GPQA Diamond95.6%89.4%
SimpleQA Verified46.5%66.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—13.5%
LMArena Expert—1461

Multimodal Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 45.3 (#15)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Vision—1285
GeoBench—88%
VPCT—72.6%
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%
Furniture Assembly75%—
LMArena Document—1413

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 55.9 (#26)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Non-English—1458
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1478
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Japanese—1488
LMArena Korean—1443
LMArena Russian—1480
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1437

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 44.4 (#63)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1452

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemini 3 Flash Preview: 65.6 (#44)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemini 3 Flash Preview
LMArena Text—1466
LMArena Creative Writing—1457
LMArena Multi-Turn—1471

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 52.3 on the Noometry Index. Gemini 3 Flash Preview costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemini 3 Flash Preview better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 51.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemini 3 Flash Preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 3 Flash Preview share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3 Flash Preview has 59.

Related comparisons

Go deeper