Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemma 2 2b IT

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

32.5

Rank #244 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 30.1.
  • Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 2 2b IT specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Noometry Index60.532.5
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1617

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1112
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1113
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1135

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1096

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Non-English—1121
LMArena Chinese—1132
LMArena French—1156
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—1083
LMArena Korean—1055
LMArena Russian—1118
LMArena Spanish—1140

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following—1118

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query—1130

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Gemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Text—1156
LMArena Creative Writing—1147
LMArena Multi-Turn—1118

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper