Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 40.1.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2025-07-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | $0.57 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $2.30 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | 597.5 |
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1399 |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1384 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.02 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |
Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1363 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1416 |
| LMArena French | — | 1379 |
| LMArena German | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1383 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 85% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1347 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1353 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1349 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1666 |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1371 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 4.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Sonnet 5.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.