Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Longcat Flash Chat

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

41.5

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 36.6.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderAnthropicMeituan
Noometry Index60.541.5
Released2026-09-28—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding—1471
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1440
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1441

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—1454

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1465
LMArena French—1457
LMArena German—1409
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Russian—1396
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following—1411

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query—1425

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text—1427
LMArena Creative Writing—1388
LMArena Multi-Turn—1418

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper