Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Mixtral 8x22B

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

26.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 21.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 95.6% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 34.1% for Mixtral 8x22B.
  • Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Claude Sonnet 5.5.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 64K.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
ProviderAnthropicMistral AI
Noometry Index60.526.7
Released2026-09-282024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M64K
Max output128K64K
Input $ / M tokens$2$2
Output $ / M tokens$10$6
Results tracked1634

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
LMArena Coding—1166
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
ALE-Bench1,819—
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
APEX-Agents75.5%—
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1150
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
Omni-MATH—16.3%
LMArena Math—1184
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
GPQA Diamond95.6%34.1%
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
LMArena Expert—1113
MMLU—77.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Mixtral 8x22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English—1128
LMArena Chinese—1116
LMArena French—1165
LMArena German—1141
LMArena Japanese—1037
LMArena Korean—1056
LMArena Russian—1158
LMArena Spanish—1150

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
IFEval—72.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1147

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query—1144

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text—1162
LMArena Creative Writing—1141
WildBench—71.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1130

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Mixtral 8x22B?

Mixtral 8x22B is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 lists at $2 and $10.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 64K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Mixtral 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper