Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher in 3 categories and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 54.0 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 31.4% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and 0% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderAnthropicAmazon
Noometry Index61.933.4
Released2026-09-282025-12-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
SciCode61%42.7%
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
LMArena Coding1513—
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
APEX-Agents75.5%—
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt31.4%0%
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1495—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math1510—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert1540—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1452—
LMArena Chinese1522—
LMArena Russian1451—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1495—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1498—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
LMArena Multi-Turn1474—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 67.3 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper