Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs o3-pro

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.7

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 66.0 to 29.0.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and o3-pro specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index60.542.7
Released2026-09-282025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output128K100K
Input $ / M tokens$2$20
Output $ / M tokens$10$80
Results tracked1612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
FrontierCode52.1%—
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
WeirdML—58.2%
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), o3-pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
CritPt31.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.43

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), o3-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
Furniture Assembly75%—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5o3-pro
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than o3-pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 42.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or o3-pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or o3-pro better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 55.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper