Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Phi-3.5-mini
Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 65.5 to 34.0.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 60.5 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-28 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 52.1% | — |
| CursorBench | 55.5% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1699 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 61.9% | — |
| SciCode | 61% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,819 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 75.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 31.4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 65% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 88.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 80.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| ProofBench | 100% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 95.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 46.5% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 75% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.