Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

60.5

Rank #10 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads 88.7 to 29.2.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderAnthropicMicrosoft
Noometry Index60.529.1
Released2026-09-282024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 65.5 (#6), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1699—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
LMArena Coding—1040
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 44.9 (#14), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
APEX-Agents75.5%—

Reasoning Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 52.4 (#29), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1028
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—

Math Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 88.7 (#4), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math—1089

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#11), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert—984

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 53.2 (#5), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1000
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1038
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1023

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—996

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text—1050
LMArena Creative Writing—1024
LMArena Multi-Turn—989

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 60.5 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.5 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper