Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Sonar Pro

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic

61.9

Rank #10 Confirmed

Sonar Pro Perplexity

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper at $2 / $10 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Sonar Pro.
  • Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Sonar Pro specifications
Claude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
ProviderAnthropicPerplexity
Noometry Index61.9—
Released2026-09-282024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output128K8K
Input $ / M tokens$2$3
Output $ / M tokens$10$15
Results tracked321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 67.3 (#6), Sonar Pro: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
FrontierCode52.1%—
CursorBench55.5%—
LMArena WebDev1774—
FrontierSWE61.9%—
SciCode61%—
LMArena Coding1513—
ALE-Bench1,819—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.0 (#16), Sonar Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
APEX-Agents75.5%—
LMArena Search—1130

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 54.0 (#28), Sonar Pro: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
NYT Connections (extended)80.5%—
CritPt31.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1495—
Mystery Game Puzzles65%—
Epoch Capabilities Index165.03—

Math Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 87.9 (#6), Sonar Pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)88.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 480.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench100%—
LMArena Math1510—
FrontierMath Erdős2.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#12), Sonar Pro: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
GPQA Diamond95.6%—
SimpleQA Verified46.5%—
LMArena Expert1540—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 51.5 (#6), Sonar Pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
LMArena Vision1289—
Furniture Assembly75%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 55.3 (#30), Sonar Pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
LMArena Non-English1452—
LMArena Chinese1522—
LMArena Russian1451—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 78.3 (#11), Sonar Pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
LMArena Instruction Following1495—

Long Context Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 45.9 (#28), Sonar Pro: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
LMArena Longer Query1498—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 66.0 (#40), Sonar Pro: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 5.5Sonar Pro
LMArena Text1471—
LMArena Creative Writing1465—
LMArena Multi-Turn1474—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 better than Sonar Pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#10); Sonar Pro does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Sonar Pro?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro lists at $3 and $15.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Sonar Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 5.5 has 32 scored results on Noometry and Sonar Pro has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper