Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Codestral
Codellama 34b Instruct and Codestral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Codestral in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 52.5% for Codestral.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 41.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 52.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | 73.8% |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | 61.9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 11.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 137.78 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 32.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Codestral?
Codellama 34b Instruct and Codestral score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Codestral better for coding?
Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.5 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Codestral share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Codestral has 7.