Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.4 to 28.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 37.1% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 57.5% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024).
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 32.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 45 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | 43.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1294 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | 57.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | 79.3% |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | 74.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| CadEval | — | 34% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 3.4% |
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |
| BALROG | — | 21% |
Reasoning Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1296 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 27.1% |
| DTBench | — | 59% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 89.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.4 |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 23.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 36.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 57.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 73.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 13.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 53.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1279 |
| MMLU | — | 86.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1161 |
| Video-MME | — | 75% |
Multilingual Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1312 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | — | 1302 |
| LMArena German | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1292 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1311 |
Instruction Following Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1297 |
| IFEval | — | 83.7% |
Long Context Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1308 |
Writing & Preference Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1319 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1296 |
| WildBench | — | 81.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024)?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better for coding?
Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45.