Noometry

Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 31.0.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index30.865.6
Released—2026-09-29
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked1434

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Coding10461487
DeepSWE—75.2%
FrontierCode—50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1755
SciCode—55.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
APEX-Agents—60%
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts10321466
ARC-AGI-2—94.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—95.5%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—61%
EBR-Bench—54.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—80%
Epoch Capabilities Index—166.09

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math10561464
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—100%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
GPQA Diamond—95.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.9%
LMArena Expert—1502

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision—1288
Furniture Assembly—80%

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English10111438
LMArena Chinese9761477
LMArena Russian—1455

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following10281468

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query10131465

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text10661447
LMArena Creative Writing10321432
LMArena Multi-Turn10151449

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper