Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 29% for Codellama 34b Instruct and 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index30.830.8
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1413

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29%20.5%
LMArena Coding10461090
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10321073

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math10561117

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1064

Multilingual Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10111033
LMArena Chinese9761070
LMArena Russian—1045

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10281056

Long Context Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10131070

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text10661080
LMArena Creative Writing10321046
LMArena Multi-Turn10151053

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.5 vs 28.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper