Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 56.0 to 52.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Codellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderMetaIBM
Noometry Index30.831.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29%29.3%
LMArena Coding10461112
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%35.4%
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10321092

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math10561143

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert—1087

Multilingual Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10111037
LMArena Chinese9761063
LMArena Russian—1060

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10281088

Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10131122

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text10661096
LMArena Creative Writing10321071
LMArena Multi-Turn10151063

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.7 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper