Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Granite 4.0 Micro
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 31.0 to 12.0.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.017 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.11 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 39.5% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 84.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Granite 4.0 Micro: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Granite 4.0 Micro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| WildBench | — | 67% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Granite 4.0 Micro?
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Granite 4.0 Micro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 Micro has 8.