Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 28.2.

Side by side

Codellama 34b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Codellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index30.832.7
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding10461210
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10321208

Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math10561208
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%

Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10111160
LMArena Chinese9761192
LMArena Russian—1187

Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10281186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10131194

Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructOlmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text10661218
LMArena Creative Writing10321199
LMArena Multi-Turn10151221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper