Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen Turbo
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Codellama 34b Instruct leads 31.0 to 15.3.
- Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | — |
Math Codellama 34b Instruct leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1056 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen Turbo?
Codellama 34b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.