Model comparison
Codellama 34b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B
Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 32.2 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1046 | 1107 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 37.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 43.9% | — |
| MBPP+ | 56.3% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1032 | 1065 |
Math Too close to call
Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1056 | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1011 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 976 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-7B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1028 | 1058 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1013 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads
Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Codellama 34b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1066 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1032 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1015 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.