Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Gemma 3 4B

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Gemma 3 4B Google

27.9

Rank #320 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Gemma 3 4B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.7 to 24.9.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 4B specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
ProviderMetaGoogle
Noometry Index33.327.9
Released—2025-03-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1230
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—19.6%

Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Hard Prompts10521253
Kagi LLM Benchmark—25.2%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—2.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.02

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.5%
LMArena Math—1239

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
GPQA Diamond—23.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.4%
LMArena Expert—1223

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Non-English9921273
LMArena German—1281
LMArena Russian—1294

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Instruction Following10241239

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Longer Query—1274

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGemma 3 4B
LMArena Text10571291
LMArena Creative Writing—1270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1068
LMArena Multi-Turn—1255

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Gemma 3 4B?

Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Gemma 3 4B better for coding?

Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Gemma 3 4B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 4B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper