Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5.3 leads 75.7 to 33.4.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-5.3 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
ProviderMetaZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index33.754.8
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked742

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
SciCode—59%
WeirdML—75.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1496
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—1,317
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
LMArena Hard Prompts10521489
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
CritPt—19.1%
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.61

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1489

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1516

Multilingual GLM-5.3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English9921457
LMArena Chinese—1528
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1499
LMArena Japanese—1453
LMArena Korean—1472
LMArena Russian—1463
LMArena Spanish—1460

Instruction Following GLM-5.3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following10241477

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference GLM-5.3 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGLM-5.3
LMArena Text10571471
LMArena Creative Writing—1457
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1472

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GLM-5.3 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper