Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.3

Rank #236 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 33.6.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.7 specifications
Codellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index33.346.6
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1636
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1423
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts10521409
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—17.7%

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
ProofBench—34%
LMArena Math—1393

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Expert—1413

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English9921392
LMArena Chinese—1476
LMArena Russian—1396

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following10241406

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query—1416

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Text10571397
LMArena Creative Writing—1391
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007
LMArena Multi-Turn—1389

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Grok 4.7 share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper