Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Longcat Flash Chat
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.0 to 33.4.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1471 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Codellama 70b Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1442 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1456 |
| LMArena German | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1411 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Longcat Flash Chat share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.