Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B NVIDIA

40.6

Rank #147 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads 45.8 to 24.8.

Side by side

Codellama 70b Instruct and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B specifications
Codellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index33.740.6
Released—2025-12-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.20
Results tracked718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1378
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
HumanEval+65.9%—

Reasoning Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10521348

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Math—1371

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.6%
LMArena Expert—1355

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Non-English9921320
LMArena Chinese—1382
LMArena French—1396
LMArena German—1348
LMArena Japanese—1268
LMArena Korean—1269
LMArena Russian—1303
LMArena Spanish—1376

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10241304

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Longer Query—1300

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text10571348
LMArena Creative Writing—1269
LMArena Multi-Turn—1319

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper