Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | 45% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | 52.3% |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Codellama 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.