Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 54.0 to 24.9.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.3 | 45.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.0 (#189), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 41.7 (#108)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1400 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1464 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 24.9% |
| τ²-bench Airline | — | 81.5% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 9.8% |
| τ²-bench Retail | — | 84.4% |
| τ²-bench Telecom | — | 97.8% |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 19.2 (#241), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 58.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 13% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.64 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.9 (#64)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 31.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1455 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#53)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 86.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1461 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.0 (#42)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1262 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.9 (#283), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 54.0 (#56)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1501 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1443 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 52.1 (#288), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1424 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.6 (#272), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.5 (#74)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Qwen3.5 397B-A17B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1438 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1401 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1447 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.7 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?
Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.