Model comparison

Codestral vs Gemma 2 27B

Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Gemma 2 27B Google

29.4

Rank #312 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 2 27B in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 2 27B leads 34.1 to 27.3.
  • Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.65 / $0.65 for Gemma 2 27B.
  • Codestral accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 8K.
  • Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codestral and Gemma 2 27B specifications
CodestralGemma 2 27B
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Noometry Index30.629.4
Released2024-05-292024-06-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K8K
Max output8K2K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.65
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$0.65
Results tracked734

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 2 27B leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Gemma 2 27B: 34.1 (#246)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%42.8%
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%52.5%
Aider Polyglot11.1%—
LiveBench Coding—36%
LMArena Coding—1211
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Reasoning Codestral leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Gemma 2 27B: 15.3 (#315)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—28.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1198
DTBench—48%
LiveBench Data Analysis—47.9%
LMCA—7.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.08
LiveBench—38.2%

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 10.7 (#311)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.4%
LiveBench Math—26.5%
LMArena Math—1212
MATH Level 5—27.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 19.0 (#280)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
GPQA Diamond—36.5%
Confabulations—27.1%
LMArena Expert—1172
MMLU—75.7%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 38.6 (#226)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
LMArena Non-English—1217
LMArena Chinese—1221
LMArena French—1247
LMArena German—1209
LMArena Japanese—1175
LMArena Korean—1174
LMArena Russian—1234
LMArena Spanish—1228

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 60.5 (#249)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.1%
LMArena Instruction Following—1206

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
LMArena Longer Query—1231

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Gemma 2 27B: 44.2 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGemma 2 27B
LMArena Text—1231
LMArena Creative Writing—1241
LMArena Multi-Turn—1224
LiveBench Language—32.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Gemma 2 27B?

Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Codestral or Gemma 2 27B?

Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Gemma 2 27B lists at $0.65 and $0.65.

Is Codestral or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemma 2 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Codestral does, with 256K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Gemma 2 27B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper