Model comparison

Codestral vs Grok 4

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Codestral Mistral AI

30.6

Rank #290 Reported

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Codestral scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4 leads 50.3 to 27.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 11.1% for Codestral and 79.6% for Grok 4.

Side by side

Codestral and Grok 4 specifications
CodestralGrok 4
ProviderMistral AIxAI
Noometry Index30.648.1
Released2024-05-292025-07-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$0.90—
Results tracked748

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
Aider Polyglot11.1%79.6%
WeirdML—45.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct41.8%—
LMArena Coding—1408
BigCodeBench Complete52.5%—
ALE-Bench137.78—
HumanEval+73.8%—
MBPP+61.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—21.1%
Cybench—43%
DeepResearch Bench—47.3%
BALROG—43.6%
LMArena Search—1142
METR Time Horizons—66.6%

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
Kagi LLM Benchmark32.5%73.6%
ARC-AGI-2—16%
SimpleBench—60.5%
ARC-AGI-1—66.7%
Chess Puzzles—28%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1409
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.44
ForecastBench—60.9

Math Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84%
Omni-MATH—60.3%
LMArena Math—1422
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—19.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
GPQA Diamond—87%
MMLU-Pro—85.1%
Confabulations—12.4%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
LMArena Expert—1415

Multimodal Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
LMArena Vision—1210
GeoBench—45%

Multilingual Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
LMArena Non-English—1403
LMArena Chinese—1427
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1429
LMArena Japanese—1394
LMArena Korean—1377
LMArena Russian—1410
LMArena Spanish—1420

Instruction Following Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
IFEval—94.9%
LMArena Instruction Following—1387

Long Context Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%
LMArena Longer Query—1409

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Codestral: —, Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCodestralGrok 4
LMArena Text—1411
LMArena Creative Writing—1397
Short-Story Creative Writing—76.9%
WildBench—79.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1416

Frequently asked questions

Is Codestral better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codestral or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codestral and Grok 4 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.

Related comparisons

Go deeper