Model comparison
Codestral vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 26.9.
- Codestral is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 256K.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 46.6 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 500K |
| Max output | 4K | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1636 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1423 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1409 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1393 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1413 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1406 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1389 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index. Codestral costs 6.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Codestral or Grok 4.7?
Codestral is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.
Is Codestral or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Grok 4.7 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 21.