Model comparison
Codestral vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.6 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Codestral: 27.3 (#321), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Codestral leads
Codestral: 19.8 (#251), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.1 versus 27.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.