Model comparison
Codestral vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 38.6 to 26.9.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1339 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1336 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1380 |
| LMArena German | — | 1315 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1327 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1350 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.