Model comparison

Command A Plus vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Command A Plus Cohere

34.7

Unranked Sparse

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A Plus scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 21.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 37.8% for Command A Plus and 51.9% for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A Plus.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command A Plus and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
Command A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderCohereDeepSeek
Noometry Index34.750.3
Released2026-05-202026-09-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output64K393K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.60
Results tracked225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Command A Plus: 38.7, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
SciCode37.8%51.9%
LMArena WebDev—1620
LMArena Coding—1511
ALE-Bench—1,092

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Command A Plus: 21.7, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
CritPt0.3%14.3%
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1485
DTBench—89.9%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.01

Math Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProofBench—54%
LMArena Math—1493

Knowledge Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Expert—1505

Multilingual Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English—1452
LMArena Chinese—1506
LMArena French—1448
LMArena Russian—1473
LMArena Spanish—1499

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1475

Long Context Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1476

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand A PlusDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1540
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A Plus better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#40); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command A Plus or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Command A Plus lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A Plus or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command A Plus and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A Plus has 2 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper