Noometry

Model comparison

Command A Plus vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Command A Plus Cohere

35.3

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.3 Z.ai (Zhipu)

54.8

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A Plus scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5.3 leads 46.1 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 37.8% for Command A Plus and 59% for GLM-5.3.
  • GLM-5.3 is cheaper at $1.40 / $4.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A Plus.
  • GLM-5.3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Command A PlusGLM-5.3
ProviderCohereZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index35.354.8
Released2026-05-202026-08-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K1M
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2.50$1.40
Output $ / M tokens$10$4.40
Results tracked242

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.3 leads

Command A Plus: 39.3, GLM-5.3: 59.5 (#14)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
SciCode37.8%59%
DeepSWE—69%
FrontierCode—40.1%
CursorBench—42.6%
LMArena WebDev—1622
FrontierSWE—30.2%
WeirdML—75.4%
LMArena Coding—1496
ALE-Bench—1,317

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 36.4 (#38)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
APEX-Agents—56.6%
Vending-Bench 2—8,164

Reasoning GLM-5.3 leads

Command A Plus: 22.4, GLM-5.3: 46.1 (#46)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
CritPt0.3%19.1%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.2%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1489
Mystery Game Puzzles—33%
DTBench—87.7%
LMCA—55.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.61

Math Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 62.3 (#33)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—68.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—29.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
ProofBench—49%
LMArena Math—1489

Knowledge Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 58.3 (#37)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—41%
LMArena Expert—1516

Multilingual Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 55.7 (#28)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
LMArena Non-English—1457
LMArena Chinese—1528
LMArena French—1499
LMArena German—1499
LMArena Japanese—1453
LMArena Korean—1472
LMArena Russian—1463
LMArena Spanish—1460

Instruction Following Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 77.5 (#23)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 45.4 (#41)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Command A Plus: —, GLM-5.3: 75.7 (#6)

BenchmarkCommand A PlusGLM-5.3
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1457
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2075
LMArena Multi-Turn—1472

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A Plus better than GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Command A Plus or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 is cheaper. It lists at $1.40 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Command A Plus lists at $2.50 and $10.

Is Command A Plus or GLM-5.3 better for coding?

GLM-5.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.5 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.3 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Command A Plus and GLM-5.3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A Plus has 2 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper