Model comparison
Command A Plus vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A Plus scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0.3% for Command A Plus and 20% for Qwen3.8 Max.
- Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $10 for Command A Plus.
- Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Command A Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 56.8 |
| Released | 2026-05-20 | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 64K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 2 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads
Command A Plus: 39.3, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 37.8% | 53.2% |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
Command A Plus: 22.4, Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 20% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1496 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |
Math Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1538 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1479 |
Long Context Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1489 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Command A Plus: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | Command A Plus | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1489 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A Plus better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#22); Command A Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Command A Plus or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; Command A Plus lists at $2.50 and $10.
Is Command A Plus or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Command A Plus and Qwen3.8 Max share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A Plus has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.